Effinger dental lab rezoning (VC-9-2026)

Opposed the rezoning on behalf of Hood subdivision residents, citing the shared easement granted for residential use only and alleging the petitioner misrepresented neighborhood support; welcomed the idea of a delay instead.

Said the expanding lab devalued his family's six-acre investment and retirement security, accused the petitioner's agent of untruths about neighbor contacts, and asked for postponement so the business can relocate.

Added that the building is visible from her home despite claims otherwise, and presented research suggesting in-house dental lab work is a growing industry, countering claims expansion is unlikely.