Batler building addition setback and lot coverage variances
Summary
The property covers 52% of its lot versus a 35% maximum, raising drainage questions near Gray Road. The city engineer found no 311 drainage complaints but the owners must still resolve on-site detention, possibly by paying into the thoroughfare fund or removing pavement.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 1
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 26, 2026.
Impact analysis
Possible $8,000 thoroughfare fund payment or detention improvements by the owners.
Downstream neighbors get drainage protection through the required engineering fixes.
Mentions & discussions (2)
Board of Zoning Appeals Hearing Officer Meeting - Oct 26, 2026
A Carmel couple wants to add onto their home at 10521 Bishop Circle with side yards slightly under code and lot coverage of 46% instead of the 35% maximum. The question is whether the addition fits the Windemere neighborhood without hurting neighbors.
Board of Zoning Appeals - Aug 24, 2026
The property covers 52% of its lot versus a 35% maximum, raising drainage questions near Gray Road. The city engineer found no 311 drainage complaints but the owners must still resolve on-site detention, possibly by paying into the thoroughfare fund or removing pavement.
Related development
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Carmel
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.